Criminal Law - Practice area
Criminal Law

DWI, Drugs, Assault, Probation Revocation, Sexual Offenses, Theft, Juvenile Defense. Felony and Misdemeanor Offenses in State and Federal Court

DUI - Practice area
DWI

Driving While Intoxicated, DWI and Your Drivers License Forney, Texas DWI Defense Lawyer.

Juvenile Law - Practice area
Juvenile Law

Sexual Offenses, Drug Offenses, Assault and Violent Crimes, Theft, Truancy/School Related Criminal Charges.

Read this important piece by The Agitator on the recent SCOTUS hearing, Virginia vs. Moore. If you want to read a transcript on how legal scholars can justify gutting one of our last constitutional protections (Exclusionary Rule), this is for you.

The Exclusionary Rule states that illegally obtained evidence can not be used at trial. It appears that SCOTUS is leaning towards diminishing that standard and sanctioning illegal conduct by law enforcement.

18 State Attorney General are arguing to end this practice so that officers can break the law without endangering drug arrests. Va. vs Moore is of course, a drug case. The State of Virginia’s goal is to win as many dope cases as possible, not to uphold constiutional protections. Prohibition has made Attorneys General full time advocates for repealing the Bill of Rights.

DWI is a danger to liberty because Officers have unlimited discretion to subjectively decide you are “intoxicated.” Combined with SFST junk science and you have a recipe for injustice.

What could make that situation even worse for the citizens of Texas? DWI arrest quotas. Austin DPS troopers operating under just such a system. These officers received memos stating that they had to make a minimum number of DWI arrests annualy.

What’s wrong with quotas? Cops chasing a number of arrests, and given wide discretion to interpret “intoxication” will arrest the innocent and spin the evidence.

Austin Energy Warrantless Surveillance

To recap- Austin Police and Austin Energy have an agreement that allows for warrantless surveillance of consumer electricity bills. Austin PD uses this information to search for marijuana growing operations sans warrant.

Request

Motion to Suppress

I prevailed at a motion to suppress last week. A suppression hearing is one where the defendant challenges the constitutionality of an arrest, search, or seizure. A plain reading of the 4th amendment would imply that all arrests require a warrant. Luckily our living breathing constitution has developed so many exceptions to that outdated rule that the vast majority of arrests are warrantless.

If you want to assert what is left of the tattered 4th Amendment do NOT consent to a search of your car. If there are no drugs in your car, there is no reason to let the police search. Believe it or not- “Those aren’t my drugs” is not a compelling defense to possession.

Prohibition begins with the idea that Americans have no right to control what goes in their body. I believe in the sovereignty of each individual to choose what substances to consume, or not consume. If you believe pot, heroin, or crack should be illegal you accept the premise that the government holds a higher power than the individual.

“But crack and heroin are dangerous”, “You don’t really think people have the right to use drugs?” I do, and here is why.

When you give up the right of individuals to use “bad” substances (crack) and place that power with the government you also give up the right of individuals to use “good” substances (unapproved cancer treatments).

I had two pre trial hearings yesterday. What is a pre-trial hearing?

In Texas pre trial hearings are used to argue certain defense motions, inter alia

Motions To Suppress– My client may have had drugs in his car, but you had no right to search it.

I recently filed an open records request with the city of Dallas. I asked for “information on how often, if ever, the Dallas SWAT team or Dallas Police, has entered the wrong house while serving a warrant.” I asked for all incidents since 2002.

Today I received my response from Lieutenant Danny Williams. Mr. Williams reports that there have been two such incidents in the last 5 years. Both are within the last 12 months. Mr. Williams forwarded one Offense Report which is sparse on details.
Mr. Williams job title caught my attention. Mr. Williams is a police officer for the city of Dallas. Yet he works for the “Homeland Security and Special Operations Division.”

Contact Information