Texas Court Disagrees with Insufficient Evidence Argument in Aggravated Assault by Threat Case

A recent criminal case before a district court in Texas highlights the importance of specific and credible testimony during trial. At issue in this appeal was the defendant’s conviction for aggravated assault by threat. On appeal, the defendant argued there was insufficient evidence to prove he threatened one of the complainants in the case. Upon reviewing the trial record, the higher court reviewed the defendant’s argument but ultimately disagreed, affirming the appeal.

Background of the Case

According to the opinion, the incident at issue involved two men fighting for space in a lane while driving on the highway. Both men rolled down their windows, and the defendant shouted profanities and racial slurs at the second man. The men both ended up at a nearby gas station, and they got out of their cars to exchange words.

Meanwhile, the complainant’s girlfriend and their two young children stayed in his car. The girlfriend testified at trial that she heard her boyfriend indicate that the defendant had a gun in his possession. Similarly, the complainant testified that the defendant had an AR rifle in his hand and that the defendant verbally indicated he wanted to shoot the defendant and his family.

The Defendant’s Appeal

On appeal, the defendant argued that the prosecution did not present sufficient evidence that he threatened the defendant’s girlfriend. To rule on this question, the court reviewed the trial record, specifically looking back through each person’s testimony during the lower court’s proceedings.

The higher court relied on both the complainant and the complainant’s girlfriend to determine that the defendant did, indeed threaten both individuals. The complainant testified about seeing the defendant’s gun and about the words that the defendant shouted at him. The girlfriend, meanwhile, testified about seeing the exchange from inside the car; she also indicated that her boyfriend yelled to her from the outside that he had a gun. It was both individuals’ understanding that the defendant wanted to hurt them both, as well as their children.

The trial court had found these individuals’ testimony to be credible. Thus, despite the fact that there was not video surveillance or eyewitness testimony, the complainant and his girlfriend offered sufficient testimony to prove the state’s case. Their testimony was specific and consistent, and the jury was right to rely on it.

It was therefore reasonable that the jury found the defendant guilty, and the defendant’s appeal was without merit. The court affirmed the guilty conviction, as well as the sentence that accompanied it.

Do You Need a Dallas Violent Crimes Attorney?

At Guest & Gray, we put our clients’ needs and priorities first, because we understand how much is on the line when facing criminal charges. Our attorneys have a proven track record of satisfaction, and we have an unmatched record of success in our litigation. If you want the best team of Dallas violent crimes attorneys by your side, reach out to our office today. For a free and confidential consultation, call us at 972-564-4644. You can also use our online contact form to tell us about your case and have an attorney reach back out to you as soon as possible.